Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using azimuths and bearings in surveying?

Using azimuths and bearings in surveying offers several benefits that enhance the overall process of measuring and understanding land. One of the key benefits is that they provide a systematic way to describe directions and angles, allowing for improved accuracy in measurements. This precision helps surveyors ensure that their data is reliable and that measurements align correctly with the physical characteristics of the land.

Moreover, azimuths and bearings serve as effective navigational aids, offering clear references for orientation. This clarity is especially useful when surveying large areas where visual landmarks may be sparse or non-existent. They also enhance the understanding of location by allowing surveyors to communicate directions more effectively, leading to better interpretations of maps and land features.

In this context, increased complexity of calculations is not a benefit; rather, it suggests that the use of azimuths and bearings may lead to more complicated mathematical processes. This can be seen as a disadvantage, as it may require additional training or expertise to manage and reduce the potential for errors associated with complex computations. Therefore, identifying this aspect as “not a benefit” highlights an important consideration when employing these tools in surveying.